This week I spoke at SCADA Australia conference, where many
of the leading companies in the SCADA, geographical industry, such as water,
power distribution, rail etc. While the increased awareness of the empowering
real-time analysis and decisions was discussed. The major discussions were
around Cyber Security strategies and threats and virtualization. The surprise
to me was the fact that the debates did not link these two discussions, and
there was very gradual take up on virtualization.
This is very different to what we have seen elsewhere in the
world especially North America and Western Europe where virtualization has
become the default approach to the industrial architecture. People discussed
the reason why people go to virtualization is a cost of servers, yes this is a
factor but in most cases this is only a side benefit. The big advantage is the
abstraction of the software application from the hardware and infrastructure.
Speaking with customers the linkage between Cyber Security
and the need to stay current, not just patching etc, is becoming a main stay of
their “sustaining” strategy. Many of the security fixes and improvements do not
happen in patches, but in point and major
releases, this is with infrastructure software such as Operating Systems, and
databases, as well as industrial software. So many leading companies are
looking at architectures and deployments that enable their systems to stay “evergreen”
eg on the current releases. The advantages happen in security but also in
general cost of sustaining the system so you do not end up with major
application jumps.
So I ask myself why you would not employ standard architectures
on a virtualized platform, allowing hardware to evolved and for high availability
architectures to allow upgrades of software and minimal time to switch over
from the running version to new version, plus providing an environment for
testing. Many of you will say that is what we doing, but within the last 6
weeks in eastern / central Europe, ASEAN and Australia I have seen a reluctance
to adopt virtualization this I would understand if we turned back the clock 4
to 5 years ago, but the technology is very mature today, and well proven.
The other trend happening is the move away from
customization and everything to configured, using standard tools and
capability. This is key to enabling applications to stay evergreen, the
advantage of customization vs cost to sustain is just not worth it. A solution
architecture decision should not an event, it must be a journey, with the key
consideration of operational continuity will be sustained which maintaining the
systems in an “evergreen” state.
No comments:
Post a Comment