Again the last 2 weeks in the USA speaking with customers the question of how they move forward towards 2020 where do we start. Too often I see people start from the easy place that of technologies and products, vs really understanding where they want to be in 2020/25. How will their run their plants, and operational practices across sites and supply chain at all levels is key. Once you know the operational processes you can determine the operational activities and effect on the roles in the company at that time, this will lead to the required solutions.
Companies have invested and executed on the tradition
alignment in a plant across process systems, and business systems such as SAP,
leveraging such guidelines as ISA 95. With the drive towards more and more
agility and rapid deployment of products to markets, these alignments are key,
but the other area of critical concern is the operational workplace. With the
rapid agility, comes more alignment, and more complexity, combined with key /
rapid decisions to be made, the operational team, and operational workspace
will be critical. Combine this with the facts that over 10000 experienced baby
boomers are retiring each week, and this rate is expected to continue for
seventeen years, and that by 2020 the 42 workforce is expected to made up
42+%
So where do you start when planning to design a system What concerned me was the throwing of
technologies around like cloud, wireless, and mobile, and looking for how,
instead of stepping back and looking at what are they trying to achieve, and
then applying technologies to that plan.
It is important to note that, in both cases, their
automation layer is mature and well established and that their business side is
also well thought through and well on the way to being established on the
second generation business system.
Again the opportunity of significant improvement and gain in
operational efficiency is at the operational layer across multiple facilities.
Again the role of people and enabling decisions in real-time are key but not
just decisions but a consistency in action in the operational control loop.
The question of where to start came up, and through the
discussion the opportunity of stepping back and taking a look at the roles that
an operational plant will require from the roles in 2020 to execute. These
roles could be on site or off site, through the concept of the “flexible
operational team”. Define the role, the day in the life of that role taking
into account location, what decisions and actions that role is responsible for
and who and what he will interact with through the day. Yes, switch into a “Facebook”
thinking of friends, but friends maybe people, (other experts) Assets,
Processes, even products. Once this map of a decisions and responsibilities
during the day is defined, this drives what information, systems and people
this role must interact with in a day. It will also determine what operational
procedures (Operational Activities) the role will potentially engage.
This role map is key as now you have a starting point, as to
driving consistency in a dynamically changing workforce. Combining these role
map, composed of “operational activities” associated with the role, where the
activity has the required notification, information, actions, community of
expertise etc. and architectural landscape so these “operational activities”
can compliment existing systems.
The architectural landscape should define the layers on top
of existing systems, in a neutral way, where these operational activities
(model driven approach) will reside, these could be local or remote hosting but
will require clear governance and require models to defined in an environment
that enables constant evolution of the practices but process experts locally
and centrally as a “crowd development”, with governance control.
This focus on a role or set of key roles allows the company to
focus on how the operational plant will run in 2020 and the key decisions that
required, and start applying these now in an architecture that lives with the
current systems, but starts to drive consistency and faster decisions across
that same role over multiple plants. Notice I have not talked technologies, my
assumption on mobile and cloud that the architecture is set up so these
activities will be able to execute independently of the device, so the adoption
of what devices are used on a plant are relative to plant and support they get,
key is the devices no matter if desktop or mobile or web should be suited to
efficiency of the role execution.
The clear opportunity is the linking of smart/ intelligent
assets to people, and optimized process, and this is the essence of distributed
industrial systems of the future on which “Internet of things’ / “Industrial
internet” and the “third Industrial Revolution” are based. Key not getting
overwhelmed with technology (it is here) it is the “job” or operational
improvement that is the opportunity, and how to achieve this. A good starting
point is understanding and achieving consistency in the key roles in the future
vs the dynamically evolving workforce.
No comments:
Post a Comment